3 ms·
AIUI, a treaty is not law unto itself. Rather, the parties to a treaty will pass laws that implement said treaty.
by pdpi 7y ago
AIUI, a treaty is not law unto itself. Rather, the parties to a treaty will pass laws that implement said treaty.
- duxat_staglatz 7y agoThis is not relevant for the political side of the question, e.g. it would not be possible for a citizen on its own to judge whether the merits of a treaty. Say, your senator campaigns on withdrawing from the Iran deal: how are you supposed to assess this position if the deal was in third-party-language Pashto? In addition, I can present the case of France, where judges must disregard laws that contradict treaties (the hierarchy of norms being Constitution > Treaties > Laws > Executive orders). Therefore treaties, even with no national law to implement them, have a direct effects on the law.
- gamblor956 7y agoTreaties are accorded to the power of law in the treaty signatories, below their Constitutional documents but above that of legislative laws. Once a treaty enters into effect, a nation is bound by the terms of the treaty even if they do not have implementing laws. However, in many cases treaties don't have any consequences if signatories don't pass implementing laws (see, e.g, the Kyoto Protocol).