4 ms·
I would argue that patents simply shouldn’t apply to this arena. It’s barely understood enough today, and locking things up with patents will only hold it back
by givinguflac 7y ago
I would argue that patents simply shouldn’t apply to this arena. It’s barely understood enough today, and locking things up with patents will only hold it back for society and concentrate power in the hands of a few.
- jobigoud 7y agoYou could also argue that an AI inventor should have the same rights and protections as a human inventor. Or maybe as a underage inventor represented by their parents.
- ngngngng 7y agoAm I misunderstanding the subject? I thought it was just asking for comments about patents for AI technology. Are we talking about patents for things invented by computers? That is a really interesting subject that I've never thought about.
- jobigoud 7y agoYes they are requesting comments on both and trying to figure out where one starts and the other ends. From the article: > 1. Inventions that utilize AI, as well as inventions that are developed by AI > 3. Do current patent laws and regulations regarding inventorship need to be revised to take into account inventions where an entity or entities other than a natural person contributed to the conception of an invention?
- Stevvo 7y agoYou will misunderstand if you don't read what is linked before you comment.