Google make this point which I haven't seen in any of the arguments so far: > In particular, we are aware of how DNS can play an important role in ISP-provided

Google make this point which I haven't seen in any of the arguments so far: > In particular, we are aware of how DNS can play an important role in ISP-provided family-safe content filtering. Lots of families with children use their ISP's safe browsing facilities which is usually implemented via alternative DNS servers. Yes it is not terribly difficult to defeat, but it is cheap and effective for small and non technical children. This does at least seem like a more sensible experiment than Mozilla's which will break the above scheme for every Firefox user.