3 ms·
If they have to be paid minimum wage I think uber will be playing a much more direct role in setting their work hours, not just whenever the app is turned on. T
by flukus 7y ago
If they have to be paid minimum wage I think uber will be playing a much more direct role in setting their work hours, not just whenever the app is turned on. They probably can't prevent them from taking a second job but they can prevent them from doing their second job when they're on the clock of the first. This actually solves a common complaint lately of drivers cancelling one ride while they pick up someone on another service.
> Another interesting consequence is potential to introduce stricter employment contracts that might say you can’t drive for a competitor...
This aspect is good for uber, there are many ride sharing apps now and drivers will flick between them and uber has zero competitive advantage. As private contractors they're free to recommend others to clients and this will go away. Bootstrapping competitors will be much harder.
- dodobirdlord 7y ago> They probably can't prevent them from taking a second job They absolutely can and they probably will. You can put almost anything you want in an employment contract, and agreeing not to work for a competitor is an extremely common clause.
- seanmcdirmid 7y agoNot in California can they do that (non compete clauses are not enforceable in California).
- dodobirdlord 7y agoI am aware, but I don't believe California's prohibition on non-competition clauses covers the scenario where you're still employed by the company.
- seanmcdirmid 7y agoIt depends if they are exempt or not. If non exempt, then no.