3 ms·
If true that DoH can be disabled at network level, ad-blocking solutions like pihole should probably implement it by default. Anyone have any idea if this is t
by josteink 7y ago
If true that DoH can be disabled at network level, ad-blocking solutions like pihole should probably implement it by default.
Anyone have any idea if this is the case?
That would at least save me a lot of trouble and work.
- Dylan16807 7y agoPihole is great because it can do all your non-browser activity. But for a browser, an ad-blocking extension works better and is less than a minute to set up. Why force it to use the same DNS blocking?
- josteink 7y agoMost mobile-browsers don’t support ad-blocking, especially on iOS.
- Dylan16807 7y agoThey're not threatening to use DNS-over-HTTPS either. But didn't iOS get browser adblocking capability in the last couple years?
- josteink 7y agoNot for third-party browsers like Chrome or Firefox. In a classic Apple-move, it’s for Safari only.
- Dylan16807 7y agoEven though those browsers have to use a safari core anyway? How strange.
- josteink 7y agoTechnically speaking they are not using Safari, but a WebView.
- EvanAnderson 7y agoAlready proposed: https://discourse.pi-hole.net/t/support-for-returning-nxdomain-for-use-application-dns-net-to-disable-firefox-doh/23243 https://discourse.pi-hole.net/t/support-for-returning-nxdoma...
- josteink 7y agoMake that already merged: https://github.com/pi-hole/pi-hole/pull/2915 https://github.com/pi-hole/pi-hole/pull/2915 Pi-hole is awesome.
- jedisct1 7y agoAlready implemented in the latest dnscrypt-proxy version.