7 ms·
When a car does it silently without being overtly antisocial they do it far more often.
by newnewpdro 7y ago
When a car does it silently without being overtly antisocial they do it far more often.
- dragontamer 7y agoLeaving all the other cars next to you in the dust is quite antisocial behavior actually. For the most part, I want to accelerate with everyone else when that green light goes off (except for Trucks: I wanna leave Trucks in the dust and get away from them ASAP). The 30mph to 60mph acceleration of off-ramp into freeway cruising speed however, is pretty important. A lot of things are going on when I merge onto a freeway, so I'd like to make sure I can accelerate in an adequate amount of time: to the point where I've (occasionally) downshift to 2nd, even in standard traffic, to get to 60mph asap.
- pixelbash 7y ago> Leaving all the other cars next to you in the dust is quite antisocial behavior actually. As a motorcycle rider I disagree, it's the safest option for us. I get that not everyone is pleased about it, though.
- dragontamer 7y ago> As a motorcycle rider I disagree, it's the safest option for us. Things are different if you're in a 4000+lb electric vehicle. The bigger the vehicle, the more polite it is to stick with the rest of traffic (or even let people pass you).
- newnewpdro 7y agoAccording to you. From a safety perspective, in stop and go traffic, the heavier the vehicle the more I want it traveling in front of me not behind me. Unless I'm certain I can completely escape its field of influence like when splitting lanes on a motorcycle.
- Ididntdothis 7y agoEven on the bike you don’t accelerate full out. You are already way ahead with half power and full power acceleration from 0 is quite risky when you get wheel spin.
- Diederich 7y ago> Leaving all the other cars next to you in the dust is quite antisocial behavior actually Honest question: can you expand on that? Assuming it's a safe thing to do, why is it antisocial?
- Zanni 7y agoSerious question: how is this antisocial behavior? I understand wanting to stick with the flow of traffic when you're part of the pack, but if you're in front of the pack, what's the advantage (to anyone) of hanging back?
- dragontamer 7y ago1. By accelerating dramatically off the line, you're telling the other cars that they are driving too slowly. 2. Alternatively: you may be sending a signal that you want to drag-race with someone. And nobody likes it when drag-racers start playing on public roads. Keep that stuff off the streets and on the track only. Now sure, if the cars next to me are driving slowly, I'll leave them in the dust. But its not something I'll do on every green-light, and its something I'd do only if they're going exceptionally slowly (ex: driving 40mph in a 60mph zone) Those are the two signals I perceive whenever someone accelerates strongly off of a green light: either #1, or #2, depending on context. There's certainly a time to signal #1, but its a relatively rare event.
- newnewpdro 7y agoSince when is the priority to not offend the drivers around you? We must live in completely different worlds. My comment re: antisocial was more in reference to noise pollution and disturbing residents at home where they have a reasonable expectation of peace and quiet.
- dragontamer 7y ago> Since when is the priority to not offend the drivers around you? Caring about others is pretty much rule #1 about living in a polite society. People who don't care about others are called sociopaths, literally anti-social behavior. Prioritizing safety on the streets, making sure you send clear signals with your actions, etc. etc. Its all part of driving and being a good citizen on the road. Part of that is absolutely understanding how others perceive your driving behaviors: if you're driving too slow, too quick, if your high-beams are too bright, etc. etc. Its also about understanding why motorcycles lane split (safety + efficiency), and other behaviors. And a lot of it is cultural: different areas have different cultures so its not a one-size fit all approach either.
- olyjohn 7y agoThat's ridiculous. The more cars you drive near, the more likely there is to be a collision. I take off from lights to get away from the pack, and I drive away from the packs on the highway. If there's nobody near you, you can't hit them.
- dragontamer 7y agoThe #1 factor in collisions is actually speed differential. If you are driving at a dramatically different speed than everyone else, you increase the chance of collision. I'm not saying drive like grandma: I'm saying drive the same speed as everyone else, to minimize the risk of collision. If you're too slow, you are as dangerous as going too quickly. Someone going 40 mph in a 60mph zone is just as dangerous as someone going 80 mph in a 60mph area. Speed differential is what causes accidents. If everyone is driving the same speed, its relatively difficult to actually hit anyone (as long as you stay out of people's blindspots). That's why downshifting to 3rd (or even 2nd) to reach 60mph ASAP while getting onto a highway is important to me.
- chrisdhoover 7y agoSpeed differential when driving in traffic, OP said to get away from traffic. There is no differential when there is no car near you
- lutorm 7y agoA rare road indeed where all other traffic is behind you...
- Dylan16807 7y agoBeing first at a red light is not very rare. And even if there are cars adjacent, you can scoot away just fine with a speed differential under 10mph.
- lutorm 7y agoMotorcycles do this too, and the drawback is that you are much more likely to run into someone who's just missing the red light in the other direction. And that will be a high-speed differential collision, not anything like contacting the people who are going in the same direction as you.
- WhitneyLand 7y agoThe word anti-social has a serious clinical psychological definition I'm not sure if that's what you intended mean. I understand it has a casual use like the word "theory" does, but this one used casually seems more unfortunate given the nasty nature of the clinical definition. Sometimes engineers are referred to as a geek, while the next moment referred to also as "anti-social" (remember before billionaires not as many people thought it was acceptable?). Who knows, as a group quirky maybe? but it seems unsubstantiated to suggest murderers are overrepresented in the population.
- natch 7y agoJohn Carmack among others agrees with you about Tesla acceleration not being antisocial. Here he is talking about it (timestamp in link takes you to the right part of the video): https://youtu.be/Ua-ikbZVofc?t=674 https://youtu.be/Ua-ikbZVofc?t=674