As long as physicists disagree on the explanation of anomalous physics, it is quite accurate to say that the physics community is in a state of doubt or confusi

As long as physicists disagree on the explanation of anomalous physics, it is quite accurate to say that the physics community is in a state of doubt or confusion about the anomaly. Note that this person explicitly asks for the dataset, and the computation of the expected curve, but hardly ever does anyone help such a person in such a direction, it is always taken as a suspected insult on the mental state of one camp of interpretation. I too would love some kind of central register or portal for the most widely accepted anomalies (anomalous.physics/dark-matter/...), where people can get and inspect observation datasets, and competing models to fit the datasets. Imagine Brahe & Kepler's, data & interpretation to be widely popular, but whenever someone asked for data or computations to compare circular orbits with elliptical ones, nobody would point them where to find such data and computations?