4 ms·
Apple apologizes for listening to Siri recordings, promises changes
- dekhn 7y agoPersonally I think this makes many of the things that Tim Cook claimed differentiated Apple from Facebook and Google much less convincing.
- zepto 7y agoDid you read about the changes they are proposing? Has any other company responded with anything like this level of responsibility? I think this shows how much more seriously they take this than their competitors.
- dekhn 7y agoYes, they're dropping retention and switching to opt-in. Because they got caught. Is that really responding with responsibility?
- lonelappde 7y agoYes. There was no issue. Then people raised an issue. They responded as requested to the issue.
- zepto 7y agoBy your logic companies that respond by correcting mistakes are just as bad as those that don’t. So you are actively supporting the behavior of Facebook and Google in doing nothing to respond to privacy concerns.
- primis 7y ago> "In a blog post Wednesday, Apple said it will require users to opt in to having their recordings listened to by human reviewers, rather than having this be the default. And only Apple employees will be allowed to listen to audio samples of the Siri interactions, rather than contract workers." This opt-in is most likely going to be packaged with the "Send data to apple" during first setup. Most people still wont know that it's sending voice unless they actually read through it.
- melan13 7y ago> "If you ask Siri to read your unread messages, Siri simply instructs your device to read aloud your unread messages." Great excuse because iMessage servers are already recording.