2 ms·
> This is wrong. You would have to additionally prove that the other thing is the only alternative. A CA theory of physics would just be math, right? Wouldn't
by api 7y ago
> This is wrong. You would have to additionally prove that the other thing is the only alternative.
A CA theory of physics would just be math, right? Wouldn't it end up being isomorphic with some mathematical representation, albeit perhaps easier to understand or evaluate in its CA form?
- tlb 7y agoCurrently, we only know continuous mathematical models of physics. A CA model would be discrete, so not isomorphic to anything we know.
- api 7y agoWhat if it's discrete but effectively matches what we know in that current mathematical methods correctly approximate it in their respective contexts and resolutions? I mean in the same sense that Newtonian physics approximates Einsteinian physics at low speeds and distances.