The safe harbor provision is here: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode17/usc_sec_17_00000512----000-.html http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscod

The safe harbor provision is here: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode17/usc_sec_17_00000512----000-.html http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode17/usc_sec_17_0... It could make sense, depending on the analogy that someone picks. For example, I have a coffee shop with a community message board. Someone posts copyrighted information there - someone tells me about it and I take it down right away. That sounds pretty fair. But what if I make a whole operation out of it - like if there are pictures, then I take those, clean them up, copy them, frame them, and put them on the wall of my shop. Now it seems like I have a lot more responsibility for what is going on. Is it fair for me to just blindly frame every single picture I find, even if some of the pictures are obviously copyrighted? Anyway that is my logical argument (as opposed to a legal one...)