4 ms·
Okay, that's a very fair statement I can agree to. However, I mostly argue that the taxpayer cost doesn't justify the gains. It's expensive and most counties a
by corodra 7y ago
Okay, that's a very fair statement I can agree to.
However, I mostly argue that the taxpayer cost doesn't justify the gains. It's expensive and most counties and cities have to foot the bill or heavily subsidize it. If the telecom company wants to foot the bill. Good on them. No arguement here. If the city has to, go fuck yourselves. Its diminishing returns to a ridiculous level.
- esmi 7y agoSome are saying ‘no’. I just hope the courts don’t overrule them. Personally I’m ok with also allowing some to say ‘yes’. 5G’s short range nature should allow this just fine. In low population density spots the economics of 5G probably won’t work out. It’s best to let communities and companies figure it out themselves rather than have the FCC blanket it everywhere.
- greenhatman 7y ago5G will probably drive AR and VR adoption. Enabling remote surgery, and other things like that. Who knows what else. Really we have no idea of the the doors it could happen. In the 90s many people thought the internet was a gimmick or a fad. Today the most successful companies are built on it. It's very likely the same will be true for 5G enabled technologies and companies.
- Dylan16807 7y agoAR in a few circumstances, maybe. VR has better connection options. Remote surgery is definitely not using a cell connection. 5G is not a revolutionary tech when we already have wifi and 4G.