3 ms·
I've been using Mercurial and git for a long time and I have to say git's workflow is a lot better. Mainly Mercurial doesn't let me pull or do other stuff with
by jimmaswell 7y ago
I've been using Mercurial and git for a long time and I have to say git's workflow is a lot better. Mainly Mercurial doesn't let me pull or do other stuff with outstanding changes, for no apparent reason other than that the author wanted it that way.
- mixmastamyk 7y ago> doesn't let me pull or do other stuff Not sure what that means?
- jimmaswell 7y agoIt just doesn't let me do things with changes in the working copy sometimes where git does. It's really annoying.
- pseudalopex 7y agoMercurial lets you pull and even update with outstanding changes.
- marcosdumay 7y agoAnd makes a mess of conflicts. I would rather not be able to do those things than to fix a conflict of a head with the working files on HG.
- silverbacknet 7y agoThis is one of my biggest pain points with hg vs git: Git is actually the one that flat-out prevents me from rebasing most of the time, usually for the most spurious of reasons, whereas hg just lets me choose to auto-rebase most files and pick the ones I'm interested in to manually merge.