5 ms·
Probably because Chrome was built not to assume enormous amounts of RAM.
by azernik 7y ago
Probably because Chrome was built not to assume enormous amounts of RAM.
- angulardementia 7y agoLol
- Waterluvian 7y agoMy point is that when the resource is available, it can't be intelligently used? Heck, shouldn't you just let the OS call the shots and simply say, "I've got ephemeral data for you to keep warm."
- skywhopper 7y agoSure, if the OS has an API for that. If it doesn't, then the Chrome developers have to figure out what to do.
- Waterluvian 7y agoIsn't the API just storing in RAM and letting a page file do its thing?
- seanmcdirmid 7y agoIn a 64-bit only world, that isn’t a bad strategy. I would guess a lot of this is just legacy from having to or having had to support 32 bit OSes.
- akelly 7y agoHow do you make sure that the video doesn't push something far more important to the pagefile? Does windows have a way of telling it the priority of an item in memory, or do you have to trust a caching algorithm?
- clhodapp 7y agoYou aren't wrong but this is also you get users who think that Chrome uses all your RAM even if you have a huge amount...
- kzrdude 7y agoIt sure seems capable of gobbling it all up (Linux, 16 GB RAM, which is no longer an enormous amount..)
- beatgammit 7y agoCompiling a game engine (Unreal) seems to use less RAM than browsing the web...
- ygra 7y agoThe linker, though ...
- rasz 7y agoIs that why its using ~150MB per open TAB while Opera 12.x used 15MB on same websites? :) Lets not kid ourselves.
- voldacar 7y agoLol chrome routinely takes up 100+MB per tab
- goatinaboat 7y agoRegularly see Chrome tabs >1Gb. What am I running in them? Jira.
- eitland 7y agoYou are not a alone and Jira is not the only offender. Maybe we should introduce sone kind of certification for developers of publically available software? Or point out the climate issues: the way you do this multiplied with the number of users who use it means x tons of CO2 released pr years in addition to annoying tye users. To add insult to injury it also means your users will have to replace their hardware more frequently than otherwise necessary. I'm only partially joking here. Im so tired of machines that should be 500 - 1000 times more powerful or more than my old PC from the nineties still being slow, and I blame it mostly on antivirus (on Windows) as well as various web technologies that are misused (on all platforms).
- Waterluvian 7y agoJira may not be the best example. It's absolute slow, crufty garbage of a web product. It's possibly the slowest, crustiest website I visit each day.
- beatgammit 7y agoSlack and Google Docs are also pretty bad.
- jsymolon 7y agoAnd raise you, Service Now.