The question is why is this story not covered by the Washington Post? The answer involves the degree of editorial indepence they have and sheds light on the pr

The question is why is this story not covered by the Washington Post? The answer involves the degree of editorial indepence they have and sheds light on the precise the motiviations of the world's richest man for buying a masthead newspaper. Different people will draw different conclusions. I suspect there will be a majority leaning in one direction.