3 ms·
When my nephew was 7 years old, he ran up a £200 bill for nonsensical digital objects on Xbox Live during the 360 era. Microsoft reimbursed my brother after we
by dynamite-ready 7y ago
When my nephew was 7 years old, he ran up a £200 bill for nonsensical digital objects on Xbox Live during the 360 era. Microsoft reimbursed my brother after we described the problem to them.
This was a little while before the media even knew there was a story. Given the early success of Xbox Live, I suspect they probably saw the issue coming long before the recent witch hunt, and did the right thing.
I think as a burgeoning social problem, it can definitely be likened to what the fast food chains are now penalised for. And as it's a burgeoning problem, there are probably no (edit - meaningful long-term) research projects to explore the link between free to play marketing and gambling problems later in life, but I'd be surprised if there's no link there.
I think it would be remiss of any organisation to call for a total ban, just as it would be for any group to call for a ban on cake... But I do think laws prohibiting the offering of in-game products to certain age groups, for cash should be considered.
Beyond that though, I think loot boxes and in-game economic structures are fair... ummm... game...
- pbhjpbhj 7y agoCake at least has a natural limit, you'll be physically sick. Loot boxes the physical limit is probably going to make everyone who isn't Bezos poor.