5 ms·

Very much a nitpick, but I really wish the font remained consistent between articles.

• xellisx 7y ago
  Didn't 2600 change fonts all over too?
  • Thoreandan 7y ago
    It's still publishing. I suppose it does. I hadn't actually noticed that aspect, as much as expecting it in the magazine format they're going for.
• chovy 7y ago
  Its very small too.
  • kgwxd 7y ago
    It's a PDF, you can zoom in as far as you want, the fonts won't be blurry.
    • zapzupnz 7y ago
      But it's not the case that on every screen you could fill the page to the desired width and still see a sufficient amount of information to make the tedious scrolling worth it.
• splatzone 7y ago
  I think different fonts can work well sometimes, it can help give each article its own tone and flavour
• gynvael 7y ago
  Sorry, that's one thing we probably cannot fix - the whole idea is that the laying out of the articles is done by authors (not us - the publisher) and the authors have (almost) full control over it. This means that while we can recommend fonts, we can't really enforce them in this model. I know the idea for the authors to do the layout is at least 'experimental' (that's the word I prefer to use), but it also gives one more space to be creative (and makes it easier for us from a certain perspective too). See also https://pagedout.institute/?page=faq.php#layout https://pagedout.institute/?page=faq.php#layout
• huhtenberg 7y ago
  Nooooo... are you kidding? That's exactly what makes every article a piece. It's perfect as it is! Unify the fonts and you get an academic-style journal.