5 ms·

Robots will do all those things you suggest simultaneously, and watch every street with cameras, scan faces at every store, pull over cars remotely, turn off yo

Robots will do all those things you suggest simultaneously, and watch every street with cameras, scan faces at every store, pull over cars remotely, turn off your power in your house, get your fired from your job, etc... This is better than racist cops? By being outraged at one cop's admission of a short cut to finding people who are due in court we are bringing the abomination of robots down on our heads.

inetknght 7y ago
> Robots will do all those things you suggest simultaneously, and And... humanity needs to have a serious discussion about the merits and risks of all of that before we rush to deploy AI.
anigbrowl 7y ago
This is a really lame argument you're making, and your trolly style isn't helping you.
- coupdetaco 7y ago
  Is it moral to push the fat guy off the bridge to stop a trolly a save a crowd of people?
  - adventured 7y ago
    No, it's still wrong, immoral, to kill that innocent person to save the crowd of people. You may, however, still choose to do it anyway, knowing full well that it's immoral. If killing one innocent person will somehow magically save one million, that too is immoral. And I'd kill that one person to save the million regardless, accepting that it is an immoral act. It's a worthwhile thing to live with, to save so many. Obviously this is in the land of outlandish hypotheticals. Non-the-less, the morality is just the same if the ratio is 1 to 10, 1 to 100, or 1 to one million: intentionally killing - murdering - an innocent person is immoral in all circumstances.
    - kmlx 7y ago
      c’mon guys, this is the old trolley dilemma: https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/amp.iflscience.com/editors-blog/trolley-dilemma-would-you-kill-one-person-save-five/ https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/amp.iflscience.com/editors-bl...
- RobertRoberts 7y ago
  My point was that people aren't looking for a real solution, they are just outraged irrationally about current events and not seeing how the masses are being steered towards a worse result than they currently have.

inetknght 7y ago

> Robots will do all those things you suggest simultaneously, and And... humanity needs to have a serious discussion about the merits and risks of all of that before we rush to deploy AI.

anigbrowl 7y ago

This is a really lame argument you're making, and your trolly style isn't helping you.

coupdetaco 7y ago
Is it moral to push the fat guy off the bridge to stop a trolly a save a crowd of people?
- adventured 7y ago
  No, it's still wrong, immoral, to kill that innocent person to save the crowd of people. You may, however, still choose to do it anyway, knowing full well that it's immoral. If killing one innocent person will somehow magically save one million, that too is immoral. And I'd kill that one person to save the million regardless, accepting that it is an immoral act. It's a worthwhile thing to live with, to save so many. Obviously this is in the land of outlandish hypotheticals. Non-the-less, the morality is just the same if the ratio is 1 to 10, 1 to 100, or 1 to one million: intentionally killing - murdering - an innocent person is immoral in all circumstances.
  - kmlx 7y ago
    c’mon guys, this is the old trolley dilemma: https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/amp.iflscience.com/editors-blog/trolley-dilemma-would-you-kill-one-person-save-five/ https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/amp.iflscience.com/editors-bl...
RobertRoberts 7y ago
My point was that people aren't looking for a real solution, they are just outraged irrationally about current events and not seeing how the masses are being steered towards a worse result than they currently have.