5 ms·

Free Software network services and web applications which can be hosted locally

138 points by chovy 7y ago

swsieber 7y ago
Now which of these are easy to run locally? I'm starting to work with minikube at work and I feel like that would be a fun solution for installation (well, minikube + helm). Another solution that seemed cool but sort of puttered out was https://sandstorm.io https://sandstorm.io
- WrtCdEvrydy 7y ago
  Most of these use docker.
- troyjfarrell 7y ago
  Sandstorm requires that the web apps are packaged specifically for it. The process is not hard, but you have to decide to do it. Sadly, most apps that have been packaged have not been kept up to date. That said, it's a great platform. I have customers using it with some marketplace apps and some custom apps. My only wish is that more people used and developed for it.
  - gitgud 7y ago
    I had a sandstorm instance for a while, but stopped using it due to the dwindling community. There are some alternatives now, but the best part about Sandstorm in particular was the small atomic backups for each Web app you had. I haven't seen other system try to abstract above the applications like that...
    - sitkack 7y ago
      Sandstorm was really ahead of its time. This is a super hard thing to know, but if what you are doing resonates with too small of a population it will take a long time become popular. I could have seen it be a great software dimension to home routers and NAS boxes.
- sabrehagen 7y ago
  I've been working on a prototype that lets you run self-hosted applications on a server which are then accessed through your web browser. I've been looking forward to incorporating applications that are on the awesome selfhosted list. Code here: https://github.com/cloud-computer/cloud-computer https://github.com/cloud-computer/cloud-computer
FloatArtifact 7y ago
Check out https://dietpi.com/ https://dietpi.com/ Great for self hosting even on a single board computer or on traditional server hardware.
- techntoke 7y ago
  Pretty cool, but anytime I see something promoting Debian anymore, I can't help but think it is probably outdated and cumbersome to create and manage packages, especially compared to Arch or Alpine, and definitely more bloated than Alpine.
  - burk96 7y ago
    Bleeding edge has never been the point of Debian, it's one of the most stable and well tested distros out there. Things are upgraded only when necessary for the most part.
  - wiz21c 7y ago
    I've been using Debian for more than 15 years and it has always been about stability. I use it for desktop use (office, mail, web, games). In the past, the stability concern meant, indeed, sub par desktop software but since the last two releases, the desktop is really good and stable. As I'm getting older I don't want to spend my time administering a system and Debian (and all its packages) have now reached a very good maturity level. Sure it's not bleeding edge, but the stable baseline is really good new. (and my PC is now ten years old). So don't judge too fast. Debian does a really good job now, even for desktop usage.
    - techntoke 7y ago
      Arch isn't bleeding edge either. It has always been stable for me and extremely easy to administer, but I have the benefit of actually having the true latest stable packages that you consider bleeding edge, but they are in fact stable just like they are called when they are released.
      - 7y ago
swebs 7y ago
I highly recommend Nextcloud. It started as a FOSS Dropbox clone, but they have since implemented easily installable server plugins (which they call "apps") that allow your personal Nextcloud server to fill the role of many other SaaS products. https://apps.nextcloud.com/ https://apps.nextcloud.com/
- fartcannon 7y ago
  Nextcloud is top notch. The kanban board is adequate, the file synced is fantastic and the tasks, calendar, contacts syncs are essential.
- paulcarroty 7y ago
  PHP, slooow as shit. I don't know how many RAM it needs to work properly.
  - krn 7y ago
    It would be interesting to learn the technical reasons for choosing PHP to implement a Dropbox clone.
    - CM30 7y ago
      I'd guess easy hostability would be the main one, not anything technical. More hosting companies support PHP than any other language, and using it means people can set up their own file sharing system without needing to know much about server management. That's arguably the reason most popular CMS systems run PHP too; because they'd rather have something that's easier to setup and can be run nearly anywhere than something that requires knowing how to use a terminal or something.
      - nine_k 7y ago
        I'd suppose it likely was an initial preference of a developer who wrote a quick prototype. I think shared hosting with php is mostly dead / makes no sense in a world of $5 VPS hosting. Anyone caring for simplicity of installation would ship a Docker container anyway (for last 5 years or so).
dorfsmay 7y ago
For me, the functionality is only 20% if the value, people spending time making sure those services are running well 24 hours a day all year round is 80% of the value. Just make that you have backups of your data, it's one thing to be deprived of services for x days, but a completely different thing to lose data forever.

138 points by chovy 7y ago

Now which of these are easy to run locally? I'm starting to work with minikube at work and I feel like that would be a fun solution for installation (well, minikube + helm). Another solution that seemed cool but sort of puttered out was https://sandstorm.io https://sandstorm.io

WrtCdEvrydy 7y ago
Most of these use docker.
troyjfarrell 7y ago
Sandstorm requires that the web apps are packaged specifically for it. The process is not hard, but you have to decide to do it. Sadly, most apps that have been packaged have not been kept up to date. That said, it's a great platform. I have customers using it with some marketplace apps and some custom apps. My only wish is that more people used and developed for it.
- gitgud 7y ago
  I had a sandstorm instance for a while, but stopped using it due to the dwindling community. There are some alternatives now, but the best part about Sandstorm in particular was the small atomic backups for each Web app you had. I haven't seen other system try to abstract above the applications like that...
  - sitkack 7y ago
    Sandstorm was really ahead of its time. This is a super hard thing to know, but if what you are doing resonates with too small of a population it will take a long time become popular. I could have seen it be a great software dimension to home routers and NAS boxes.
sabrehagen 7y ago
I've been working on a prototype that lets you run self-hosted applications on a server which are then accessed through your web browser. I've been looking forward to incorporating applications that are on the awesome selfhosted list. Code here: https://github.com/cloud-computer/cloud-computer https://github.com/cloud-computer/cloud-computer

FloatArtifact 7y ago

Check out https://dietpi.com/ https://dietpi.com/ Great for self hosting even on a single board computer or on traditional server hardware.

techntoke 7y ago
Pretty cool, but anytime I see something promoting Debian anymore, I can't help but think it is probably outdated and cumbersome to create and manage packages, especially compared to Arch or Alpine, and definitely more bloated than Alpine.
- burk96 7y ago
  Bleeding edge has never been the point of Debian, it's one of the most stable and well tested distros out there. Things are upgraded only when necessary for the most part.
- wiz21c 7y ago
  I've been using Debian for more than 15 years and it has always been about stability. I use it for desktop use (office, mail, web, games). In the past, the stability concern meant, indeed, sub par desktop software but since the last two releases, the desktop is really good and stable. As I'm getting older I don't want to spend my time administering a system and Debian (and all its packages) have now reached a very good maturity level. Sure it's not bleeding edge, but the stable baseline is really good new. (and my PC is now ten years old). So don't judge too fast. Debian does a really good job now, even for desktop usage.
  - techntoke 7y ago
    Arch isn't bleeding edge either. It has always been stable for me and extremely easy to administer, but I have the benefit of actually having the true latest stable packages that you consider bleeding edge, but they are in fact stable just like they are called when they are released.
    - 7y ago

swebs 7y ago

I highly recommend Nextcloud. It started as a FOSS Dropbox clone, but they have since implemented easily installable server plugins (which they call "apps") that allow your personal Nextcloud server to fill the role of many other SaaS products. https://apps.nextcloud.com/ https://apps.nextcloud.com/

fartcannon 7y ago
Nextcloud is top notch. The kanban board is adequate, the file synced is fantastic and the tasks, calendar, contacts syncs are essential.
paulcarroty 7y ago
PHP, slooow as shit. I don't know how many RAM it needs to work properly.
- krn 7y ago
  It would be interesting to learn the technical reasons for choosing PHP to implement a Dropbox clone.
  - CM30 7y ago
    I'd guess easy hostability would be the main one, not anything technical. More hosting companies support PHP than any other language, and using it means people can set up their own file sharing system without needing to know much about server management. That's arguably the reason most popular CMS systems run PHP too; because they'd rather have something that's easier to setup and can be run nearly anywhere than something that requires knowing how to use a terminal or something.
    - nine_k 7y ago
      I'd suppose it likely was an initial preference of a developer who wrote a quick prototype. I think shared hosting with php is mostly dead / makes no sense in a world of $5 VPS hosting. Anyone caring for simplicity of installation would ship a Docker container anyway (for last 5 years or so).

dorfsmay 7y ago

For me, the functionality is only 20% if the value, people spending time making sure those services are running well 24 hours a day all year round is 80% of the value. Just make that you have backups of your data, it's one thing to be deprived of services for x days, but a completely different thing to lose data forever.