4 ms·
I think a good strategy for Microsoft would be to reuse as much as possible CI/CD code from github in Azure devops. Azure devops probably doesn’t need to be as
by rmetzler 7y ago
I think a good strategy for Microsoft would be to reuse as much as possible CI/CD code from github in Azure devops. Azure devops probably doesn’t need to be as flexible as long as it is robust and just works. Github will probably be the place where experiments can happen.
- pas 7y agoAzure Pipelines is currently considered the best CI/CD solution. (For example see GitLab issues about how users would like GitLab to improve theirs.)
- twalla 7y ago[citation needed]
- Guillaume86 7y agoI'm in the process of replacing TeamCity with Azure Pipelines (not my choice). It's ok but I also doubt it's best in class, TeamCity is far better IMO (more flexible, more informations/actions on one screen, less clicks, better logs display, better tests results display, live tests results, etc). I wish they had an hosted offer, and yaml configuration.
- pas 7y agoCan't find the discussion now on GitLab, but I recall comments claiming that Azure Pipelines is very flexible, and GitLab CI's new task DAG should be modeled after that.
- kkapelon 7y agoLast time I checked Azure Pipelines still doesn't have build caching https://developercommunity.visualstudio.com/content/idea/365799/improve-hosted-build-agent-performance-with-build.html https://developercommunity.visualstudio.com/content/idea/365... F.S. I work for Codefresh a CI/CD solution
- jbrantly 7y agoThey just added it in preview within the last couple weeks.
- GordonS 7y agoYou can bodge your own solution if you use your own build agent. For hosted build agents, this is about to change, as a new caching task is in preview. I've tried it, and it's unstable at the moment, so I'd recommend just waiting until it's out of preview.