3 ms·
"Make JavaScript an optional feature of QML." and "Support compiling QML to efficient C++ and native code." Yes! These two things are what's been on the very t
by dkersten 7y ago
"Make JavaScript an optional feature of QML." and "Support compiling QML to efficient C++ and native code."
Yes! These two things are what's been on the very top of my wishlist ever since QML/QtQuick was first released.
- stabbles 7y agoI would love this! In fact the QML format would not even be a terrible way to write non-UI applications, I'd think. Something like MySqlDataBase { id: default_db host: ... } UserController { items_per_page: 20 formatter: UserFormatter {} repository: Repository { table: "users" database: default_db } } is definitely more easier to follow than the linear version auto default_db = std::make_shared<MySqlDataBase>("..."); auto userformatter = std::make_shared<UserFormatter>(); auto repository = std::make_shared<Repository>("users", default_db); auto controller = std::make_shared<UserController>(20, userformatter, repository); especially when you do some kind of constructor injection with nested objects. The declarative tree structure of QML is great.
- dkersten 7y agoYes! You can already do it, but you pay a lot of overhead in unneeded QObject/QQuickItem features that you don't need, so if they can improve that, and it sounds like they're working on it, then I think that would be fantastic.
- halflings 7y agoIt doesn't look as bad if you skip the intermediate variable declarations, since you're not re-using those variables elsewhere. (the QML structure only works as long as this is the case, e.g clear nesting of instances)
- dkersten 7y ago> clear nesting of instances You can have references (default_db in the example) to instances to have indirectly nested instances too.
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- p2t2p 7y agoBeen there, done that, SQL queries in JSP. Trust me, you don’t want your business and data access layers mixed with your presentation
- Octoth0rpe 7y agoThat's not what they're suggesting though. The suggestion is to be able to implement business / data access layers in the same style/language that people are implementing their presentation. That the two would be intermixed could certainly be an intended consequence / anti pattern, but I don't think it's inevitable.