4 ms·
This is a bad excuse for the really flakey nature of nfs, other network filesystems do not have its issues.
by quazeekotl 7y ago
This is a bad excuse for the really flakey nature of nfs, other network filesystems do not have its issues.
- Volt 7y agoLike which ones?
- throwaway2048 7y agoAFS is a good example of a network filesystem that takes properties of the network into account, however its a little weird and not fully compliant with POSIX filesystem semantics. However, it scales like crazy and is very powerful and reliable.
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- IcePic 7y agoI ran AFS for very long, it does have issues which perhaps other network fs'es don't even notice. It has issues with clients behind NAT for instance, the callbacks won't work. The limit of files in a dir is less than for local filesystems (or were) so Maildirs with long mail filenames could get into something that feels like "out of inodes but not space" situations. All in all, it was very nice though.