3 ms·
If you're interested in slow queries, try the one below (via [1]): the OR google OR a OR "supercalifragilisticexpialidocious" -the -google -a You can repl
by lol768 7y ago
If you're interested in slow queries, try the one below (via [1]):
the OR google OR a OR "supercalifragilisticexpialidocious" -the -google -a
You can replace the "supercalifragilisticexpialidocious" term with something unique if the results end up cached. This takes upwards of 5 seconds to return back.
[1] https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-slowest-Google-query https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-slowest-Google-query
- amelius 7y agoOne question is, will such complicated queries bring all of Google to a crawl, or will they e.g. be executed with lower priority or on different servers, leaving the rest of the queries unaffected?
- pcnix 7y agoOf course they don't affect other queries, these would be non-locking queries on replicas. Or, to be even more accurate, they'd be non blocking queries on indices cached in memory on edge servers and probably several levels of optimization beyond that. There's no reason for these type of queries to lock a database.
- amelius 7y agoI wasn't concerned about locking, but more about resource utilization. Searches are read-only, so I suppose locking doesn't need to happen anyway.
- needs 7y agoOr just search for "powered by".