[CGroups original developer] Yes, for tracking processes and reliable resource control. Prior to cgroups, in Google's Borg cluster management daemon the best s

[CGroups original developer] Yes, for tracking processes and reliable resource control. Prior to cgroups, in Google's Borg cluster management daemon the best strategy I was able to come up with for reliably and efficiently tracking all the processes in a job was: - assign each job a supplementary group id from a range reserved for Borg, and tag any processes that were forked into that job with that group id - use a kernel netlink connector socket to follow PROC_EVENT_FORK events to find new processes/threads, and assign them to a job based on the parent process; if the parent process wasn't found for some reason then query the process' groups in /proc to find the Borg-added group id to determine which job it's a part of. - if the state gets out of sync (due to a netlink queue overflow, or a daemon restart) do a full scan of /proc (generally avoided since the overhead for continually scanning /proc got really high on a busy machine). That way we always have the full list of pids for a given group. To kill a job, nuke all the known processes and mark the group id as invalid, so any racy forks will cause the new processes to show up with a stale Borg group id, which will cause them to be killed immediately. This approach might would have had trouble keeping up with a really energetic fork bomb, but fortunately Borg didn't generally have to deal with actively malicious jobs, just greedy/misconfigured ones. Once we'd developed cgroups this got a lot simpler.