3 ms·
I find the characterization of RDS Aurora as not proven, or unstable, as odd. I thought it looked like one of the more mature-seeming choices on the market. A
by etaioinshrdlu 7y ago
I find the characterization of RDS Aurora as not proven, or unstable, as odd.
I thought it looked like one of the more mature-seeming choices on the market.
Any thoughts?
- vasco 7y agoFrom the point of view of someone who's used Aurora Postgres since it came out, though you sometimes are exposed to bugs, AWS support has always been great and we never faced anything super serious. It's been almost a year since we had any problems though. This on a somewhat large aurora instance at around 5TB, so it's already representative for a lot of people.
- takeda 7y agoRight now if you use Aurora Postgresql 9.6 you don't have an easy way to migrate to 10, and 11 is not even available. They supposedly are working on a solution, but won't disclose when it will be available.
- sciurus 7y agoIt's way less mature than vanilla MySQL or postgresql.