3 ms·
Nobody was concerned about using stem cell technology or stem cell research. The opposition was/is entirely to the death of embryos in order to obtain some ste
by brightball 7y ago
Nobody was concerned about using stem cell technology or stem cell research.
The opposition was/is entirely to the death of embryos in order to obtain some stem cells for research. It's not as if it's some anti-science policy.
It's simply a continuation of anti-abortion politics, which a lot of people feel very strongly about and invokes a ton of ethical questions. As long as there can be a perception that someone was killed in order to provide the stem cells to save someone else, that's not going to go away.
Find ways to research stem cells without doing that and all of those concerns vanish.
- dekhn 7y agoThe program I'm describing was funded to work with stem cells derived from embryos. https://www.cirm.ca.gov/about-cirm/cirm-faq#embryos https://www.cirm.ca.gov/about-cirm/cirm-faq#embryos "All the embryos used in CIRM-funded research were donated from IVF clinics. They had either been rejected for implantation and were going to be destroyed, or the couple had decided to stop storing the embryos for future use. The embryos used to create embryonic stem cell lines were already destined to be destroyed."
- lonelappde 7y agoIt depends on what kind of anti-abortion one is. Catholics are anti IVF. Mysogynist patriarchists are pro-IVF.
- teknopaul 7y agoI think you'll find lots of mums are pro-IVF.
- smileysteve 7y agoThis is nuance; Of which entertainment news and polarized parties are not very good at exploring.
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]