4 ms·
I meant the LTS model such as Ubuntu 18.04 gives you old version software with the possibility of worse functionality and more security holes. Arch may be more
by effie 7y ago
I meant the LTS model such as Ubuntu 18.04 gives you old version software with the possibility of worse functionality and more security holes. Arch may be more up-to-date than Ubuntu, but it isn't in the same category; it is not LTS, and it is not as widespread.
- mort96 7y agoI was mostly responding to the part about how "The distribution model has the advantage of single click install". What's the difference in how "single click" installation can be between rolling and LTS?
- effie 7y agoThe point is classic distributions which support their product for a long time (Debian, Ubuntu,RHEL,Centos) are easier to use for basic users you can meet on street. With Arch or Gentoo, you are right that there is a package manager which makes installation of software easier, but the system is not easy to use for BFUs. When problems with installation/upgrades arise (which is more likely for Arch/Gentoo), you are expected to spend some time becoming proficient GNU/Linux user who resolves things in command line.
- Dylan16807 7y agoCitation needed on the number of problems, assuming the classic system is actually being updated from release to release so it can continue to receive critical updates.