4 ms·
The source is extremely biased toward patent protection. Beyond the pale biased. ipwatchdog writers believe patents, copyright, trademark, etc, should be trea
by kevin_b_er 7y ago
The source is extremely biased toward patent protection. Beyond the pale biased. ipwatchdog writers believe patents, copyright, trademark, etc, should be treated like real estate. Afforded the highest ownership protection. By them, it should last forever, be unassailable, and be inheritable.
Ipwatchdog is a fundamental enemy of the progress of the science and the arts, as nothing would be left to do without paying some patent or copyright troll. Doing anything "on the internet" would be patented from old expired patents with "on the internet" added.
Anything this website says should be taken with a grain of salt at all times.
- AnimalMuppet 7y agoYeah, I noticed the rather strong bias. It leaves me a bit unclear on how to interpret the situation, though. Does this leave software patents as (mostly) dead as the article says? Or is this just "the sky is falling" rhetoric from patent maximalists?
- bryanrasmussen 7y agoIt seemed a bit much, but I still thought it was interesting to hear their take on it.