Your experience may be 100% true and it would still not hold a lot of value for other people to hear about it. Either what you say is true and the odds of it ha

Your experience may be 100% true and it would still not hold a lot of value for other people to hear about it. Either what you say is true and the odds of it happening are so small nobody can count on it happening to them, or what you are saying is not true and they still cannot count on it happening to them. It is great that you survived and got the miracle cure that no doubt many people wish for, but if that story isn't one that helps or can inform other people why do they need to hear and acknowledge you? Especially given that the fact that it is medically a miracle makes it impossible to prove means that anyone else can only take it on faith. For the one miracle that happened to you, there are millions of people on the internet making huge claims that are almost definitely wrong. This isn't an environment conducive to good faith. Then there is the frankly fairly problematic amount of anger that you express this with. It's perfectly understandable given the rest of the context that you put forth, but it makes the whole story even less palatable than it already was. Your position that the fact that your doctor prioritised people who were actively dying means that you look crazy to everyone else is one that I can't follow, I'm afraid.