4 ms·

Name one city you believe is seeing weather they haven't seen in the last 200 years and I bet we can go back and find data that shows otherwise

• Kaiyou 7y ago
  Sure we could, but that wouldn't support the current narrative crafted to garner support for a CO2 tax. People should always pay attention when the solution to any given problem is supposedly more taxation.
  • dTal 7y ago
    You're implying that a shadowy conspiracy of politicians and climate scientists has, over the course of decades, spun the entire concept of climate change out of whole cloth purely to justify an otherwise-pointless tax? And, for good measure, that all tax is illegitimate?
    • krageon 7y ago
      This thread went straight from denying changes to conspiracy theories about tax, all without a single shred of proof.
      • Kaiyou 7y ago
        Since when was proof required when talking about climate change? If there was actual proof that human activity makes a difference, there wouldn't be any denial.
    • Kaiyou 7y ago
      Taxation is theft on gunpoint. You can't opt out and get nothing of value in return. I see no evidence that trusting politicians is a thing people should do. Neither would I put much value onto what studies say that were paid for by people with an interest in discovering climate change, which we used to call global warming, but then stopped, because it never actually got much warmer over the course of decades. If you want people to believe you start with being believable. For example, make a prediction that actually comes true. Never seen something like that in relation to "climate change".