3 ms·
These definitions are rather vague. If the car is able to function even when noone responds to the request for intervention, how is that different from level f
by mac01021 7y ago
These definitions are rather vague.
If the car is able to function even when noone responds to the request for intervention, how is that different from level five? Does it mean that it safely pulls over, where level 3 would just drop control of the vehicle in a dangerous scenario?
Also, does level 5 entail general intelligence, in order to do things like follow the instructions of a traffic cop or parking attendant?
- solarkraft 7y ago> Does it mean that it safely pulls over Yes (or just stop - the idea is that it will not crash). > general intelligence Your examples would most likely be situations that would be trained for. I doubt that any system in the next few (5-50) years will be able to adopt to a completely new situation as well as a human.
- ghaff 7y agoYes, but there is still vagueness. Depending upon where you are and the circumstances, there may be no "safely pull over." I've certainly gotten into very low visibility situations on highways (snow squall, very heavy rain) where put on hazards and crawl along as best you can and pull over to the side of the road are pretty much equally bad alternatives.
- MegaButts 7y agoI don't think this is a problem with the classification, I think this is a problem with how hard it is to build a self-driving car even if you give it these limitations. You're just making a point for how hard a Level 4 system is to build, not how hard it is to define.