2 ms·
Also you can easily put solar over e.g. car parks, in which case you don't even need a proper roof if you funnel water from the panels towards the gutters witho
by namibj 7y ago
Also you can easily put solar over e.g. car parks, in which case you don't even need a proper roof if you funnel water from the panels towards the gutters without splashing the users walking to the cars. The cost should be within 30% of the panel price itself for a decent-size parking lot, less if you can get economies of scale through standardized modules that are placed next to each other to form rows for the cars.
A bonus would be that the cars don't heat up as much/get packed with snow.
And the land isn't wasted, because there is no reason not to have a roof over a paved parking lot other than the fact that a roof costs money to build and maintain, which isn't an issue with solar. You already can't use the land for plants/nature, so you might as well put your solar there instead of some open field/grassland that can be used for something else.
- anoncake 7y ago> You already can't use the land for plants/nature You can put plants on rooftops, we just don't.
- kalium-xyz 7y agoYou ever see those projects where they generate biofuel from algae growing ontop / against building using special build tanks? Its really cool.
- bubblewrap 7y agoCool, but also energy efficient?
- anoncake 7y agoIt certainly beats bare roofs. AFAIK photosynthesis is still more efficient than photovoltaic, too. In any case, it's easier to store biofuel than electricity.