3 ms·
>You'd also have to take into account that the sites are monitoring things like reaction times to bets and raises, hand range consistency, etc. You might be su
by tuesdayrain 7y ago
>You'd also have to take into account that the sites are monitoring things like reaction times to bets and raises, hand range consistency, etc.
You might be surprised by the lengths people go to in order to bypass bot-detection just for ordinary games. All of the things you mentioned are pretty standard. Considering there is serious money on the line here, I am positive that plenty of poker bots will be virtually indistinguishable from professional players, if they aren't already.
- Phillipharryt 7y agoThe same argument of money being on the line applies to the detection. Poker software is already pretty damn impressive with its tracking. The online casinos actually stand to lose more money than the bot creators could make, so the detection has a greater incentive, and is likely to triumph.
- pbhjpbhj 7y agoThey only lose if there are less plays, surely? I assume they take a cut of all winnings, they're not putting up stakes.
- Phillipharryt 7y agoYes, I'm assuming that if bots work their way into everyday online poker that people will stop using it, so there would be less players.