>If logically followed, it very obviously means they can never remove any person from their platform for responding to a public official, at the very least. It

>If logically followed, it very obviously means they can never remove any person from their platform for responding to a public official, at the very least. It entirely supersedes any restrictions that Twitter puts into their terms of service on behavior. Yes, that is the cost to Twitter in hosting an official government account. If they do not like this, they can choose to not host an official government account. Same way as if a venue decides to host an official government function they forfeit their normal ability to ban people for as long as that venue is serving as an official government location. To give an extreme example, even a school cannot ban a registered sex offender from being on the premise as long as the school is serving as a voting place (assuming the individual still has their right to vote, which may possibly have been removed but isn't guaranteed).