3 ms·
So, it's not protected by YT's definition.
by madmulita 7y ago
So, it's not protected by YT's definition.
- monocasa 7y agoYeah, YouTube's definition is self serving, and breaks apart for many important use cases. Their real definition is "we allow/block whatever makes us look good in the court of public opinion", and to think they have any real definition beyond that is a fallacy.
- pbhjpbhj 7y agoI expect it's a slight more meta metric, I doubt they care about the court of public opinion beyond its relevance to company profit.
- monocasa 7y agoSure, but the medium term relevance to company profit isn't a metric you meaningfully have until it's too late to do anything about. You can actually react to the court of public opinion, and reacting to that will pretty much give you a level of CYA as a decision maker, so there's not really a down side on that end.