3 ms·
You're kidding me with the analogies. Seriously? "Google" is not a person/individual. I'd definitely place _why, brad fitzpatrick, and zed shaw as POSSIBLE equ
by babeKnuth 16y ago
You're kidding me with the analogies. Seriously?
"Google" is not a person/individual. I'd definitely place _why, brad fitzpatrick, and zed shaw as POSSIBLE equals to einstein and tesla, but that would still be a stretch...
- jimbokun 16y ago""Google" is not a person/individual." Neither was "Edison".
- raleec 16y agoThomas Edison? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Edison http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Edison
- jimbokun 16y agoFrom that article: "Edison was legally attributed with most of the inventions produced there, though many employees carried out research and development under his direction. His staff was generally told to carry out his directions in conducting research, and he drove them hard to produce results." So, when you read "Edison invented such and such", it really means that the people working under him invented such and such. So, it really is similar to the way "Google" is inventing lots of interesting things. The difference is Larry and Sergey refrain from claiming that they personally invented everything that comes out of Google.
- babeKnuth 16y agoSorry, i was making the HUGE leap of faith that the reference to "thomas edison" was being made. So which is the original reference to: "edison the co." or "thomas edison"? Edit: "edison" wasn't even mentioned in the original post???