4 ms·
Agree. Robotics hasn’t even really penetrated the market for treatment or diagnostics yet. There are many opportunities.
by godzillabrennus 7y ago
Agree. Robotics hasn’t even really penetrated the market for treatment or diagnostics yet. There are many opportunities.
- swiley 7y agoI'm really not sure it will any time soon. I think robot enthusiasts sometimes underestimate what hands attached to a brain full of knowledge really are capable of. There's a problem software developers have to solve if they really want robots to be a full replacement for a human physically performing a task and that's a way for the trained humans to communicate their knowledge to the robot. The problem with this is that most people really aren't great at communicating precisely. They have a hard time teaching each other and are often hopeless when it comes to giving precise and complete instructions for something to a robot. forget complex tasks like surgery even gardening and washing dishes is hard. Even something as simple as "grab the thing" is a pretty big project. Maybe in the future as robots become more common speaking with the level of precision required will also become common (kind of like what happened to culture with the web and email.)
- philips 7y agoI think you are thinking of robotics in the sense of replacing surgeons or being an autonomous partner. While OP is talking of robotics as an assitive tool to help a surgeon make finer or less invasive movements.
- canada_dry 7y agoI'd really like to see robotic (light's out) pharmacies become a thing. Removing the extremely expensive Pharmacist from simply counting pills for things like repeats of common medications. This would surely reduce consumer costs with little/zero risk.
- copperx 7y agoThe idea of having a pharmacist is outdated and terribly expensive. Most countries dispense medications in blister packs. Why should anyone have to count pills in the first place? Give the patient a 7, 14, 30 or 90 count blister pack and done.