3 ms·
> Retiring at 60 would pose financial challenges for many people in the US. Which is frankly insane too. It's not like the wealthiest nation on Earth couldn't
by js8 7y ago
> Retiring at 60 would pose financial challenges for many people in the US.
Which is frankly insane too. It's not like the wealthiest nation on Earth couldn't support these people.
- brookside 7y agoUSA is the 10th wealthiest nation per capita.
- nradov 7y agoHave you actually run the numbers? We could support an earlier retirement age but it would require a major reduction in living standards and higher taxes for everyone else. There's nothing insane about opposing that.
- barking 7y agoToo much defence spending perhaps?
- js8 7y agoThis is a complicated can of worms... In the past, it was certainly possible to have high living standards economies and relatively low retirement age. I don't think, even if you take longer age into account, that people are such a big spenders that it would be impossible to replicate today. There is a theory that lot of (especially service and high-pay) jobs are actually bullshit, and detract rather than add social value. So if people retire these jobs sooner, living standards might actually increase for everybody.