5 ms·
It is, but only if you don't end up consuming significantly more, or with a poorer consumption pattern. I have no data on this but I wouldn't be surprised if de
by mehrdadn 7y ago
It is, but only if you don't end up consuming significantly more, or with a poorer consumption pattern. I have no data on this but I wouldn't be surprised if delivery made people consume noticeably more than they otherwise would, and/or batch up fewer things at a time than they would.
- viraptor 7y agoI'm really curious about the result. While your point is valid, there's the other side as well - never shop hungry. And considering the local supermarket is busiest after 5pm, I'm sure many people do. So there's buying extra for convenience vs impulse buying what you see. In my personnel experience shopping online, the impulse buys go away, but I make the shopping list the same way, with one big batch a week, so overall buying less.
- mehrdadn 7y agoYeah, I am too. My point was just that it's harder to know than appears at first glance without actually measuring. It could easily go either way.
- nradov 7y agoThat can't possibly be true. For most people, consumption is limited by income. And average incomes are barely rising.