3 ms·
The word "Common" is a reference to the language Common Lisp: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_Lisp https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_Lisp. No explicit
by btilly 7y ago
The word "Common" is a reference to the language Common Lisp: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_Lisp https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_Lisp.
No explicit link with the tragedy of the commons was implied. Implicitly, of course, it applies - there are many participants, each of which is aware of their own gain and unaware of how their actions cost everyone else. The result is that when they all get their changes in, the result is terrible for everyone.
For another example, C++ is a terrible language, but it contains many good ones.
- amelius 7y ago> No explicit link with the tragedy of the commons was implied. Okay, but the article says: > Adapted from a 2015 es-discuss thread. “Common Lisp” is not the topic. It serves only as one of many illustrative counter-examples. So if "Common Lisp" is not the topic, and the tragedy of the commons is not the topic, then it seems the title is not very well chosen.