3 ms·
My observation is that humans' ability to effectively self-govern maxes out around 100 million, maybe even closer to 70 million. If you look at the world happi
by hadlock 7y ago
My observation is that humans' ability to effectively self-govern maxes out around 100 million, maybe even closer to 70 million.
If you look at the world happiness report/index, the top 50 countries are all under 100 million (exceptions: US, Mexico) and not especially large landmass (exceptions: US, Australia).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Happiness_Report https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Happiness_Report
Growing up watching Star Trek I always thought the idea of some benevolent global government running in a post scarcity future was the goal we should all be shooting for but in retrospect it looks about as flawed as traditional communist command economies.
- raxxorrax 7y agoMaybe the effect is countered by the relative autonomy of US states and perhaps money does indeed make happy: https://www.credit-suisse.com/corporate/en/articles/news-and-expertise/the-global-wealth-report-2016-201611.html https://www.credit-suisse.com/corporate/en/articles/news-and... But nevertheless I think that distributed and subsidiary governance is at least less less efficient. That said, I would instantly exchange my government for the united federation of planets.