38 ms·
Sounds by that story that the other orders were intended for the other people eating given that the peanut free order was explicitly made. So I can only assume
by CogitoCogito 7y ago
Sounds by that story that the other orders were intended for the other people eating given that the peanut free order was explicitly made. So I can only assume the waiter assumed the rest was an order for the others? Maybe that assumption may not (legally) be made and a warning needs to be made for everyone at a whole table? Either way that seems like a bit of a gray zone. Sounds almost like the point was to trip up the waiter.
- pbhjpbhj 7y agoThis I think it's exactly it, they are trying to trip the people up and it's not realistic.
- kqr 7y agoWhen you are really allergic to peanuts, it can be an issue just to sit at a table where someone eats peanuts. A waiter should know this. Unlike many other things they deal with, it's literally a matter of life and death.