3 ms·
I was just under two minutes and I'd have added the following by memory: - Spanish readers are faster than English - A key reason for the discrepancy between
by adverbly 7y ago
I was just under two minutes and I'd have added the following by memory:
- Spanish readers are faster than English
- A key reason for the discrepancy between previously measured reading speeds and the new results is recreational vs test-style assessment. Basically it sounds like people read faster when they are being assessed on their reading.
- It should take about 2 minutes and 30 seconds to finish reading the article.
And then doing a 30 second skim a second time I would have added the following:
- Reading speed depends on if the text is long or short. Shorter text can be much slower.
- Reading speed declines with age.
A third skim and I'd add:
- this is important for assessors, who shouldn't expect everyone to read at 300wpm.
Looking back and comparing my notes across the three reads I actually remember recognizing each one of those points the first time through, but I didn't reliably remember them all after each run. I almost think this might have more to do with the way that memory works than the way reading works.
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]