3 ms·
And also it isn't anti-adblocker tech. It is pro-privacy tech which will require adblockers to reengineer how they work which has caused their authors to throw
by tssva 7y ago
And also it isn't anti-adblocker tech. It is pro-privacy tech which will require adblockers to reengineer how they work which has caused their authors to throw a whine fest and feed some good click bait quotes to the press.
- mantap 7y agoYour argument is that I shouldn't trust my privacy to Raymond Hill but I should trust it to Google?
- kevingadd 7y agoAs a veteran chrome extension developer, I'm more inclined to trust extension authors than I am to trust the chrome extension API development team, because it's a bad API with bad documentation and bad performance. Google's claims that the new API will be faster were already shown to be a blatant lie.
- mdekkers 7y agoYour tone is somewhat offensive towards people that have made a significant positive contribution towards the privacy, online protection, and sanity, of many people. A quick look at your comment history shows you to be a somewhat rabid Google fanboy/apologist, if not an outright astroturfing employee. Any suggestion that the upcoming manifestv3 changes as they relate to ad-blocking are not a direct response to the (potential) loss of revenue Google reported themselves are downright laughable.
- kasey_junk 7y agoAccusing someone of astroturfing is specifically against the site guidelines (for good reason, it’s like being accused of being a witch. There is no defense against it). Maybe edit out that paragraph?