5 ms·
gimp is great a great tool and a great example of free software
by stOneskull 7y ago
gimp is great
a great tool and a great example of free software
- raxxorrax 7y agoDefinitely! With gtk as a small "waste product".
- chrisseaton 7y agoWhy do you think Gtk is a waste product?
- deathtrader666 7y agoI think he meant GTk as a "side product"..
- raxxorrax 7y agoJust trying to be snarky. GTK is awesome of course. I just like the story about how GTK was crafted for GIMP and since then spread to many other places. I still often hear about it being referred to as Gnome Tool Kit for example.
- chrisseaton 7y ago> Just trying to be snarky. I think that's explicitly against the site guidelines here.
- Synaesthesia 7y agoCan’t tell if sarcastic.
- grzm 7y agohttps://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html > "In Comments" > "Be kind. Don't be snarky. Comments should get more thoughtful and substantive, not less, as a topic gets more divisive."
- alexwennerberg 7y agoMaybe I'm an idiot, but I use GIMP occasionally and find the UI horrendously confusing. Every time I use it I have a web browser tab open with "How to [X] in GIMP".
- skocznymroczny 7y agoFor me the webbrowser tab says "Where to download Paint.NET"
- microwavecamera 7y agoGIMP has been my goto graphics software since the early 2000's and yes, this is true. Several common tasks that Photoshop has baked in or has a plugin for has to be done manually in GIMP. Since 2.10 the plugins have really improved but it still definitely has a steep learning curve compared to Photoshop. Another good open-source alternative is Krita. It has a really good balance between usability and features with a slick, modern UI.
- yellowapple 7y agoI don't feel like it's any worse (or better) than Photoshop usability-wise. Really, given the sheer complexity of that sort of raster image editor, confusion is unfortunately par for the course.
- bscphil 7y agoCould you give examples of this? I use Gimp non-professionally a few times a week. (Photo development work is done in other apps, including RawTherapee and Lightroom.) I must say that I find GIMP incredibly easy to use, much easier than Photoshop for example (but also much less powerful than Photoshop). The tools consistently make sense and are where I expect them to be, and I find the menu bar to be well set up. Dividing the different functions into Image / Layer / Colors / Filters makes a lot of sense to me. (I do use the system GTK theme with color icons, which I don't think is the default, but it makes the tools much easier to see for me.) I'm not doubting that some people have trouble using GIMP but I have no idea what those problems are, because most people aren't specific about what parts of the UI confuse them. I've yet to see a graphics editing program that was at least as powerful as GIMP and less confusing.