5 ms·

I started eating keto over a year ago, and found that I totally lost my appetite for sugary and other carb-based foods, so have just kept it up. One thing that

I started eating keto over a year ago, and found that I totally lost my appetite for sugary and other carb-based foods, so have just kept it up. One thing that was eye opening to me was from paying close attention to food labels. I used to try to mostly eat "healthy", so I'd tend to buy the "low calorie" options. What surprised me was how basically they just substitute fat for sugar. Ceasar dressing normal has 1g carbs and 4g fat per Tbsp (45 cal), but low calorie is 4g carbs and 1.5g fat per Tbsp (30 cal). This adds up, and I think I was actually eating a pretty unhealthy balance of macronutrients (fat/protein/carbs) while thinking I was eating healthy, despite my BMI slowly creeping up over a decade to being middle of "overweight" (I'm now in the middle of "normal" range, just from changing my diet). Well I think treating sugar like smoking is far too extreme, I do think the demonization of fat along with the addition of excess sugar to "healthy" food options is a terrible combination, and that needs to end.

richk449 7y ago
> I used to try to mostly eat "healthy", so I'd tend to buy the "low calorie" options. It amazes me how many people make this mistake.
- solveit 7y ago
  I mean, the industry only spends hundreds of millions pushing this impression, so...
  - richk449 7y ago
    Sure, but nobody sees cigarette adds, and actually says "I smoke because it makes me look cool". Nobody sees beer ads and says "I drink because it makes pretty girls hang out with me". Yet many many people say "I buy the diet food because I am watching my weight". Generally speaking, people are pretty good at rationally analyzing advertisements. The ads may still be effective, but almost nobody believes them at face value. Except for diet/low-fat/natural products. It's like people turn off their bullshit detectors for them. I just don't understand why.
TazeTSchnitzel 7y ago
I think the demonisation of fat might be partly a linguistic problem. “fat” is a derogatory term for someone who is overweight, but it also happens to describe an important component of food, so the (incorrect) connection forms itself: eating fat = getting fat. This isn't the case in all languages, though I don't know if that actually has meant Germany or wherever cares less about fat content.
- StavrosK 7y ago
  Maybe we should call it "lipids"? Not sure if that's the same.
  - buu700 7y ago
    I've always preferred the French nomenclature: carbohydrates are glucides and fats are lipides.
- chronial 7y ago
  Fun fact: German shares that linguistic property with English. But I agree with your point.
- JMTQp8lwXL 7y ago
  There seems to be two major camps when it comes to weight loss: this confused thinking of lowering fats to lose weight (as you mention), and conversely, CICO (calories-in, calories-out). In Western diets, it is all too easy to binge on processed carbs. For people struggling to manage weight, that is usually the main issue. Diets such as Keto or Paleo tend to restrict processed foods which make it hard or nearly impossible to consume processed carbs. Restrictions from these diets naturally lead to CICO. The body only cares to consume so much whole foods -- you can eat a very large quantity of vegetables before hitting an equivalent amount of calories from processed foods (like potato chips, etc). These diets are essentially an "easy" framework (easy conceptually, challenging in practice for some due to cravings) for following CICO and reducing calories.
- marton78 7y ago
  German is a bad example, "fett" means "fat" in both senses of the word. But still, people don't care so much about nutrition in general over here.
jniedrauer 7y ago
I think it should be made clear that we simply don't know enough about keto yet to call it "healthy." More healthy than sugar over-consumption? Almost certainly. I will say that it allowed me to cut to under 10% bodyfat with almost no effort, so for that I think it is a valuable tool. But I also found that I was not making progress in my athletic hobbies until I stopped eating keto. My progress visibly accelerated after I stopped. So I hesitate to recommend it as anything other than a short term body recomposition tool. Fat may not be evil, but carbs aren't either.
- 1123581321 7y ago
  What kind of diet did you switch to when you moved away from keto?
  - jniedrauer 7y ago
    Mainly whole foods. Almost entirely vegan. Quinoa, beans, fresh vegetables, whole wheat bread, whole wheat pasta, avocados, olive oil, are my staples. But I think the specific diet isn't that important. Cutting out the processed foods and high glycemic index sugars is the most important part.
- nindalf 7y ago
  I can echo this. I'm on keto right now and I have no trouble for most of the day. What troubles me is strenuous activity. I can still do it, but I take longer to recover. If I'm lifting, I rest twice as long between sets. I went for a run today that shouldn't normally give me trouble but I was knackered by the uphill stretches. I don't mind much. I feel healthy, I'm losing weight and my mind feels focused the entire day.
  - rorykoehler 7y ago
    That's temporary. It goes away during long term ketosis. I've been in ketosis for over a year and have found my endurance to be fine but my top end power to be decreased (cycling). I'm still competitive but I think if I was eating carbs I could add ~20% to my max power based on historical numbers.
wickoff 7y ago
I've been trying out carnivore diet for a couple of months. I went from years of yo-yo dieting and pathological binge eating to effortlessly losing 10% of my bodyweight. I think my psychology got rewired somehow, I don't know how else to explain such a drastic change in behavior.
- travv0 7y ago
  I just finished a month of carnivore and have stopped doing it, as my life had become a living hell from my frequent and urgent trips to the bathroom. Other than that, it was good for my waistline.
retiredcoder 7y ago
That happens a lot, specially in places selling healthy snacks. I used to work for one of them at certain point and the secret sauce was mostly using tons sugar and/or salt to increase sales. Unless one puts a lot of effort (which can be quite expensive when running a business), healthy food doesn’t sell well.
mtoddsmith 7y ago
Sugars affect your gut biome which in turn affect the hormones your body produces which affect your insulin, cravings and hunger.
kovrik 7y ago
My wife and I are doing IF (OMAD - One Meal A Day). And obviously don't eat junk food, sugar etc. For me the biggest surprise was how little food we actually need. I remember myself few years ago eating a breakfast in the morning, then coffee with a muffin or donut first thing at work, then huge lunch, then another snack, then huge dinner at home (of course! just came from work - need to treat myself) and then maybe another snack before going to bed. Can't even imagine how many calories and sugars we were consuming each day. We were literally overeating every single day. Now we eat only once a day, avoid junk food and sugars, feel awesome, look and feel much better. And it works for us even with quite intensive hiking trips and with gym/exercises.

richk449 7y ago

> I used to try to mostly eat "healthy", so I'd tend to buy the "low calorie" options. It amazes me how many people make this mistake.

solveit 7y ago
I mean, the industry only spends hundreds of millions pushing this impression, so...
- richk449 7y ago
  Sure, but nobody sees cigarette adds, and actually says "I smoke because it makes me look cool". Nobody sees beer ads and says "I drink because it makes pretty girls hang out with me". Yet many many people say "I buy the diet food because I am watching my weight". Generally speaking, people are pretty good at rationally analyzing advertisements. The ads may still be effective, but almost nobody believes them at face value. Except for diet/low-fat/natural products. It's like people turn off their bullshit detectors for them. I just don't understand why.

TazeTSchnitzel 7y ago

I think the demonisation of fat might be partly a linguistic problem. “fat” is a derogatory term for someone who is overweight, but it also happens to describe an important component of food, so the (incorrect) connection forms itself: eating fat = getting fat. This isn't the case in all languages, though I don't know if that actually has meant Germany or wherever cares less about fat content.

StavrosK 7y ago
Maybe we should call it "lipids"? Not sure if that's the same.
- buu700 7y ago
  I've always preferred the French nomenclature: carbohydrates are glucides and fats are lipides.
chronial 7y ago
Fun fact: German shares that linguistic property with English. But I agree with your point.
JMTQp8lwXL 7y ago
There seems to be two major camps when it comes to weight loss: this confused thinking of lowering fats to lose weight (as you mention), and conversely, CICO (calories-in, calories-out). In Western diets, it is all too easy to binge on processed carbs. For people struggling to manage weight, that is usually the main issue. Diets such as Keto or Paleo tend to restrict processed foods which make it hard or nearly impossible to consume processed carbs. Restrictions from these diets naturally lead to CICO. The body only cares to consume so much whole foods -- you can eat a very large quantity of vegetables before hitting an equivalent amount of calories from processed foods (like potato chips, etc). These diets are essentially an "easy" framework (easy conceptually, challenging in practice for some due to cravings) for following CICO and reducing calories.
marton78 7y ago
German is a bad example, "fett" means "fat" in both senses of the word. But still, people don't care so much about nutrition in general over here.

jniedrauer 7y ago

I think it should be made clear that we simply don't know enough about keto yet to call it "healthy." More healthy than sugar over-consumption? Almost certainly. I will say that it allowed me to cut to under 10% bodyfat with almost no effort, so for that I think it is a valuable tool. But I also found that I was not making progress in my athletic hobbies until I stopped eating keto. My progress visibly accelerated after I stopped. So I hesitate to recommend it as anything other than a short term body recomposition tool. Fat may not be evil, but carbs aren't either.

1123581321 7y ago
What kind of diet did you switch to when you moved away from keto?
- jniedrauer 7y ago
  Mainly whole foods. Almost entirely vegan. Quinoa, beans, fresh vegetables, whole wheat bread, whole wheat pasta, avocados, olive oil, are my staples. But I think the specific diet isn't that important. Cutting out the processed foods and high glycemic index sugars is the most important part.
nindalf 7y ago
I can echo this. I'm on keto right now and I have no trouble for most of the day. What troubles me is strenuous activity. I can still do it, but I take longer to recover. If I'm lifting, I rest twice as long between sets. I went for a run today that shouldn't normally give me trouble but I was knackered by the uphill stretches. I don't mind much. I feel healthy, I'm losing weight and my mind feels focused the entire day.
- rorykoehler 7y ago
  That's temporary. It goes away during long term ketosis. I've been in ketosis for over a year and have found my endurance to be fine but my top end power to be decreased (cycling). I'm still competitive but I think if I was eating carbs I could add ~20% to my max power based on historical numbers.

wickoff 7y ago

I've been trying out carnivore diet for a couple of months. I went from years of yo-yo dieting and pathological binge eating to effortlessly losing 10% of my bodyweight. I think my psychology got rewired somehow, I don't know how else to explain such a drastic change in behavior.

travv0 7y ago
I just finished a month of carnivore and have stopped doing it, as my life had become a living hell from my frequent and urgent trips to the bathroom. Other than that, it was good for my waistline.

retiredcoder 7y ago

That happens a lot, specially in places selling healthy snacks. I used to work for one of them at certain point and the secret sauce was mostly using tons sugar and/or salt to increase sales. Unless one puts a lot of effort (which can be quite expensive when running a business), healthy food doesn’t sell well.

mtoddsmith 7y ago

Sugars affect your gut biome which in turn affect the hormones your body produces which affect your insulin, cravings and hunger.

kovrik 7y ago

My wife and I are doing IF (OMAD - One Meal A Day). And obviously don't eat junk food, sugar etc. For me the biggest surprise was how little food we actually need. I remember myself few years ago eating a breakfast in the morning, then coffee with a muffin or donut first thing at work, then huge lunch, then another snack, then huge dinner at home (of course! just came from work - need to treat myself) and then maybe another snack before going to bed. Can't even imagine how many calories and sugars we were consuming each day. We were literally overeating every single day. Now we eat only once a day, avoid junk food and sugars, feel awesome, look and feel much better. And it works for us even with quite intensive hiking trips and with gym/exercises.