10 ms·
I made a SFW porn viewer from Reddit subs
- kwhitefoot 7y agoI had to turn off Firefox content blocking to see the thumbnails. :-(
- LifeLiverTransp 7y agoI somehow expected a NN-Pictureviewer, that takes an NSFW-content and converts it into a landscape poster.
- thekyle 7y agoI couldn't find unixporn in there.
- soyguzzler 7y agoSomething like that for the imaginary* subreddits would be fantastic. https://www.reddit.com/r/ImaginaryNetwork/wiki/networksublist https://www.reddit.com/r/ImaginaryNetwork/wiki/networksublis...
- pradn 7y agoYou're forgetting the best one! https://www.reddit.com/r/unixporn?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share https://www.reddit.com/r/unixporn?utm_medium=android_app&utm...
- ddeokbokki 7y agoI will never understand people that make textual item list and don't sort them in some logical way (such as alphabetical).
- greenyoda 7y agoIt would be nice to attribute these photos to their photographers, or to at least provide a link back to the original Reddit post. If you only link to the JPEG files, there's no way to find any information about the photo. Also, it may be a violation of Reddit's TOS or the photographers' copyrights to redisplay this content without attribution.
- chovy 7y agoGood idea. I'll link back fromt he title.
- chovy 7y agoI added a link back to the original post.
- greenyoda 7y agoThanks! One more suggestion: It would be easier to browse through a category of pictures if there was a way of advancing to the next picture without having to close the current one and go back to the thumbnails. For example, maybe clicking on the photo could display the next photo in the category. I also agree with other commenters that using the term "porn" can have adverse side-effects in terms of getting the site banned in workplaces. It might also get your site misclassified by search engines. Not to mention that people who are not aware of this usage of the word could be confused about what the site is really about. Finally, I also had problems with Firefox 67 (on Windows). The errors I'm getting in my console are: 1. Cross-Origin Request Blocked: The Same Origin Policy disallows reading the remote resource at https://www.reddit.com/r/EarthPorn/hot.json https://www.reddit.com/r/EarthPorn/hot.json. (Reason: CORS request did not succeed). 2. The resource at “https://www.reddit.com/r/EarthPorn/hot.json” https://www.reddit.com/r/EarthPorn/hot.json” was blocked because content blocking is enabled. In error #2, the content is blocked because Firefox thinks that www.reddit.com is a "tracker" site. If I disable content blocking for your site, it works OK in Firefox.
- rolltiide 7y agoI wonder how long before Merriam-Webster and Oxford include porn definitions as the conflicting sexual and non-sexual connotations Google already does, anything that arouses senses.
- Fnoord 7y agoFirst sentence from Wikipedia article [1] > Pornography (often abbreviated porn) is the portrayal of sexual subject matter for the exclusive purpose of sexual arousal. The slang version just means 'pictures I appreciate'. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pornography https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pornography
- rolltiide 7y agoIt's not clear why you wrote this You just took the worst source for an English definition, felt compelled to actually include the source as if to dispel unproductive skeptical responses, and then explained what the slang version was in response to a comment telling you both the actual and slang definitions, who had asked when the slang definition will be upgraded for inclusion in the best sources for English definitions
- Fnoord 7y ago> You just took the worst source for an English definition I'll agree to disagree with you on that one. As for my point. My point is that the word porn/porno/pornography doesn't mean what you said it does for Wikipedia. Which suggests for a large population of the world (including myself). That it has that meaning on Reddit or amongst youth is just cargo culture.
- rolltiide 7y agoIt looks like Oxford and others already have included the expanded definition. You would be in the minority by elevating Wikipedia over them, and I can just as easily modify Wikipedia and also give sources to their curators to gain consensus there. Will your opinion magically change because of that? You don't have to use the word that way, you just have to know what people are referring to and viola language is achieved. Cargo culture is also part of the living dictionary, Oxford has accepted that before you.
- rezonant 7y agoYou should use browser navigation (different url per page) because a single tap on back button brings you back to hackernews :)
- Anarch157a 7y agoYou could just subscribe to r/NoSillySuffix/
- wickedOne 7y agodoesn't work at all using firefox (67.0.1)?
- jamestomasino 7y agoIt appears to be CORS related: Cross-Origin Request Blocked: The Same Origin Policy disallows reading the remote resource at https://www.reddit.com/r/EarthPorn/hot.json https://www.reddit.com/r/EarthPorn/hot.json. (Reason: CORS request did not succeed). Firefox's security model doing its job
- chovy 7y agoThanks. I’ll take a look at why it doesn’t work.
- emayljames 7y agoAndroid Firefox 67 is non-funtional. Also noticed that on mobile Chrome, the list of *porn links covers the full screen; stopping you from seeing the images.
- chovy 7y agoI'm using 67 and it works fine for me. What doesn't work for you?
- wickedOne 7y agonothing does; no images and non functional links. looks like firefox' content blocking prevents some resources from loading, basically disabling your site. apart from the obvious google tag blockage this one pops up in the console: Cross-Origin Request Blocked: The Same Origin Policy disallows reading the remote resource at https://www.reddit.com/r/EarthPorn/hot.json https://www.reddit.com/r/EarthPorn/hot.json. (Reason: CORS request did not succeed).
- chovy 7y agowhat OS? it works on LInux
- bsimpson 7y agoYou're missing bikeporn.
- gk1 7y agoRelated: One time I was showing an intern something on my screen, and when I went to type a URL into Chrome it auto-suggested reddit.com/r/justiceporn, which I must've visited recently. The intern became visibly uncomfortable until I explained what "porn" meant in that context, and even loaded the page for good measure.
- thunderrabbit 7y agoI had the same concern. The word "porn" might be blocked, or prejudiced by [Work], making the page not safe for Work. If possible, drop the the^H^H^H word "porn" from the top page at least.
- pugworthy 7y agoI have an old MG Midget, and collect pictures of well restored engine compartments. Folder name: midget_porn.
- lilbobbytables 7y agoI'd be very interested in this
- tein 7y agoExcuse me, but some images are not fully shown for example vertical images on wide screens. Maybe add a button to change image fitting from cover to contain and viceversa?
- ASalazarMX 7y agoThe inconsistency of HumanPorn not being pornographic has always annoyed me. Maybe a HumanPornPorn is needed.
- adventured 7y agoI have one suggestion. I'd add the ability to click outside an image to close it, rather than having to click on the smallish X in the upper right corner of the image. Works mostly fine on desktop Firefox 67.0.1, except the "More" button doesn't work at all.