4 ms·
Title here is missing the critical element at the end "on Youtube" that is present on the article. The HN title makes it sound like Google was engaging in the
by kevin_b_er 7y ago
Title here is missing the critical element at the end "on Youtube" that is present on the article.
The HN title makes it sound like Google was engaging in the harassment, rather than not banning a particularly obnoxious and rude provocateur from YouTube.
- fred_is_fred 7y agoGoogle, as the owner of Youtube, it not only profiting from an online homophobic personal harassment campaign by selling ads, it's paying someone to do it via the stream's ad revenue. It's not as far of a stretch as you seem to think it is.
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]