4 ms·
I wasn't aware of "ch". Why prefer it to rem? (and isn't ch in family with em, not rem - that is, "advance width" relative to element font size, not root elemen
by e12e 7y ago
I wasn't aware of "ch". Why prefer it to rem? (and isn't ch in family with em, not rem - that is, "advance width" relative to element font size, not root element font size?)
Ed: i guess in this case 1 rem is roughly 2 em (styled element has 50% font size) - and 1 ch is roughly 1 em?
- JoshuaRLi 7y agosee https://www.reddit.com/r/css/comments/bb73cw/58_bytes_of_css_to_look_great_nearly_everywhere/ekj8yhm/ https://www.reddit.com/r/css/comments/bb73cw/58_bytes_of_css...