4 ms·
Again, spraying with roundup is not the issue at the heart of the suit mentioned (he was using roundup BEFORE the GMO seeds were purchased by a neighbor). The i
by Supermancho 7y ago
Again, spraying with roundup is not the issue at the heart of the suit mentioned (he was using roundup BEFORE the GMO seeds were purchased by a neighbor). The issue is about planting without a license. The spraying of roundup was a step in the process used to trigger the licensing issue, after replanting what survived. He was never sued for using Roundup. Since you've reverted to downvoting and repeating yourself, you're wrong and are not interested in acknowledging it. GL with whatever.
- tptacek 7y ago1. I haven't downvoted you. In fact: I don't think I even can; you can't downvote responses to your own comments on HN. 2. The guidelines ask you not to complain about downvoting. 3. Your argument boils down to "that thing you said is true". It's fine to just agree! We don't have to pretend to disagree just for the sake of appearances.