> it puts one in mind of LaRouchites putting everything down to Aristotle and Bertrand Russell and the change in attunement of instruments. Yes, LaRouche and h

> it puts one in mind of LaRouchites putting everything down to Aristotle and Bertrand Russell and the change in attunement of instruments. Yes, LaRouche and his gang are crazy. I don't share their philosophical views, and I certainly don't agree with their political methods. (Apparently, they are so inconsequential that I can't even remember who they are. I've only heard about them twice before, and each time I needed to look the Wikipedia entry to learn about them all over again.) Having read the page now, I can say with certainty that I oppose LaRouche's views more than most people do: I despise his most beloved philosophers. Your claim is like saying that because creationists and evolutionists both have ideas on the origin of life, and because one group (the creationists) is clearly nuts, the sane scientific mindset has no validity because it also advances a worldview.